Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is a widely used band-gap semiconductor with vast applications in photocatalysis, photovoltaic, and spintronics. Recent advances by Japanese researchers has sparked interest in TiO2 for electro-photo-catalytic splitting of water, since this mineral is a widely used white pigment with UV absorbance characteristics. The Achilles heal of this application is its large band-gap (3.20 and 3.00 eV for anatase and rutile crystal phases, respectively). Hence the push toward doping for lower band-gap. Among the several anionic dopants attempted, N was the most effective for lower band-gap and thus enhance photocatalysis under visible light. This is made possible by the overlap of the N 2p orbitals with the O 2p orbitals with respect to the energy it would take for a photon to knock an electron out of those orbitals and into the so-called conduction band, where current can be generated. This makes intuitive sense since N and O are neighbors on the periodic table. Doping with N can be further enhanced with C. Doping with only carbon is bad because its 2p orbitals do not overlap with the O 2p orbitals, which would create separate quantum levels for conducting electrons to occupy and not do anything. However, the C 2p orbital overlaps with the N 2p orbital. This means we'd have 2p orbitals from two dopant atoms overlap with the oxygen 2p, which gives engineers more flexibility in lowering the TiO2 band-gap.
Up to then, little data has been collected on these C- and N-doped TiO2. The paper by Ruzybayev et al attempts to fill those gaps. Experimental data was acquired via hard x-rays from the National Synchrotron Light Source (NSLS) in Brookhaven National Laboratory (now closed because NSLS II is opening now). Hard x-rays have an energy range of 5-15 keV (about the same as medical x-rays), and penetrate into the sample bulk; soft x-rays range 1-5 keV and only penetrate the surface of a sample . Both types of x-rays are useful, but it depends on the application. This makes for an interesting paper because my master's thesis was a theoretical study of hard x-rays inducing photoemission from a magnetic multilayer structure. The technique is known as hard x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (HXPS).
The experimental section will be skipped for brevity, but the specimens were TiO2 films that were only 500 nm thick. That's close to the wavelength of blue light. The optical band-gap of pure TiO2 and co-doped TiO2 is shown in UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy data on Figure 1.
Pure TiO2 has a band-gap of 3.30 eV, as evidenced by the upward slope of the solid curve in Figure 1. Codoping lowered the band-gap to 2.39 eV, (deeply slanted slope of the dashed curve). The analysis from HXPS data is displayed in Figure 2. This can be considered the "meat" of the paper because it explicitly shows how the C and N dopants affect the electronic structure of TiO2. "Electronic structure" has many contexts, but the important one here is the oxidation state of titanium.
Up to then, little data has been collected on these C- and N-doped TiO2. The paper by Ruzybayev et al attempts to fill those gaps. Experimental data was acquired via hard x-rays from the National Synchrotron Light Source (NSLS) in Brookhaven National Laboratory (now closed because NSLS II is opening now). Hard x-rays have an energy range of 5-15 keV (about the same as medical x-rays), and penetrate into the sample bulk; soft x-rays range 1-5 keV and only penetrate the surface of a sample . Both types of x-rays are useful, but it depends on the application. This makes for an interesting paper because my master's thesis was a theoretical study of hard x-rays inducing photoemission from a magnetic multilayer structure. The technique is known as hard x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (HXPS).
The experimental section will be skipped for brevity, but the specimens were TiO2 films that were only 500 nm thick. That's close to the wavelength of blue light. The optical band-gap of pure TiO2 and co-doped TiO2 is shown in UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy data on Figure 1.
![]() |
Figure 1. Approximated band-gaps for pure TiO2 and C and N doped TiO2. |
![]() |
Figure 2. HXPS of titanium 2p orbital in pure form and doped with C and N. |
Photoelectron spectroscopy can be measured at ultra-violet wavelengths. That is useful for measuring the valance band maximum, which the authors have done here. More specifically, they measured the change in photoelectron kinetic energy relative to the O 2p orbital.
![]() |
Figure 3. Valence orbital data of pure, C doped, N doped, and both C and N co-doped TiO2. These spectra are measured relative to the O 2p orbital. |
Experimental data was compared with data calculated from computational models that varied the locations of dopant atoms in a TiO2 unit cell. According to Figure 4, what matters is which atoms are the dopant atoms bonded to. That in turn affects the photoelectron spectra due to the so-called density of states (DOS), which I won't go into because that is too advanced for this blog. What I can say is the DOS allows you to calculate photoelectron spectra that you then compare to experiment. If theory and experiment don't match, try a different model.
![]() |
Figure 4. Density of states for co-doped TiO2 unit cells. In the insets, blue, light blue, red, and orange spheres represent Ti, O, C, and N atoms, respectively. |
ReplyDeleteThis is not the case, however, as the functional benefits greatly outweigh the appearance aspect.
This will ensure that no bubbles or uneven areas are present, which will facilitate the drying process.
For information: Reflectometry